And for a dozen millionaires to stand on a stage in Manhattan, toast with champagne, and promise to reestablish the value of (their) music, well, it didn’t go so well. After all, people don’t buy what you do – they buy why you do it. We at Woden are big believers in the value of a story. And not what most people would expect from a service whose offerings are actually pretty compelling – on paper at least. Fans and critics alike, who accused it of being elitist and its owners greedy, also derided the service in the weeks following its launch. The app has plunged in popularity in the App store and it counts just 770,000 subscribers – compare this figure to Spotify’s 15 Million. So how has the service fared since Jay and Bey’s grand announcement? Finally, TIDAL offers CD-quality sound, better than the 320 KBPS streaming offered by Spotify. And because of its partnerships with these artists, TIDAL also offers early access to new releases and exclusive content that is unavailable anywhere else. Thus, thinking goes, musicians will receive higher royalty rates for their songs. TIDAL costs $19.99 per month and is owned by artists, instead of investors or technologists. Although some artists complain of their royalty rates, these services have been widely adopted by consumers. The streaming space is crowded and full of well-established competitors like Spotify, Pandora, and Apple Radio. Jay, with the First Lady of Hip Hop (his wife Beyoncé), and friends ranging from Alicia Keys to Jack White to Daft Punk, promised to “reestablish the value of music” with their new streaming service, TIDAL.Įven for a man who has encouraged people to, “dream big, be unrealistic,” this was a lofty goal. The new law "announces a dark period of online censorship", Human Rights Watch added.A few weeks ago, Jay-Z stood alongside an A-list of pop stars and announced a “movement” to “change the course of history.” "Journalists already spend years behind bars for their critical news and social media users must self-censure in fear of offending the authorities," said Andrew Gardner, Amnesty researcher for Turkey. While Ankara says the regulations are geared at controlling the spread of disinformation online, critics claim the restrictions are part of a crackdown on free speech in the country.Įarlier this year, Amnesty International described the measures as the "latest and perhaps the most brazen attack on free expression in Turkey". Web services face massive fines and potential blocks on access in Turkey if they fail to comply with the regulations.Įarlier this month, the Turkish government issued a 10 million lira ($1.3 million) fine to social media giant Facebook for failing to appoint a local representative in the country. The new restrictions were tightened this year and now require internet-based broadcasting and social media services such as Netflix and YouTube to appoint a legal representative in Turkey and comply with government requests to remove content.Īt least 130,000 websites and 10,000 YouTube videos have been blocked under the wide-ranging restrictions, according to data collected by internet freedom advocacy group EngelliWeb. Last year, Ankara issued new internet regulations requiring any internet-based service with audio-visual or radio content to acquire government-issued licenses. The Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTUK) said it had halted access to Tidal and other services after the company failed to acquire a Turkish broadcast license.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |